Skip to content
Fact-checking in the course

Two auditors. Two models. One process you can verify.

Every statement in a course is independently verified by two language models against archived sources; if they contradict, a rule decides — and in doubt, a human. Built for the instructor who owns the content: They see what is verified, what is disputed, and why.

Vorführung — ein aufgezeichneter Fall

Welcher Artikel der KI-Verordnung regelt die Pflichten für KI-Modelle mit allgemeinem Verwendungszweck?

Werfen Sie eine Frage hinein und sehen Sie zu, wie zwei Prüfer unabhängig voneinander suchen — und wie entschieden wird, wenn sie sich widersprechen.

Prüfer A

Sprachmodell 1

  • Quellen erscheinen, sobald die Prüfung läuft.

Prüfer B

Sprachmodell 2

  • Quellen erscheinen, sobald die Prüfung läuft.

Quotes are verified

A certificate only counts if the statement is actually present at the cited location. A model that fabricates a source loses immediately.

The source decides, not the quantity

The legal act overrides the authority’s interpretation, the interpretation overrides the expert contribution. Repeating it a hundred times changes nothing.

The process is allowed to say “I don’t know”

If both sides rely on equally strong sources, a human decides—and disputed content is marked as disputed in the course.

Why this is documented. The EU AI Act requires that the use of artificial intelligence be traceable and that a human can intervene. Every judgment records which rule applied, which sources supported it, and who confirmed it — accessible to the administration and the instructor.