Two auditors. Two models. One process you can verify.
Every statement in a course is independently verified by two language models against archived sources; if they contradict, a rule decides — and in doubt, a human. Built for the instructor who owns the content: They see what is verified, what is disputed, and why.
Vorführung — ein aufgezeichneter Fall
Welcher Artikel der KI-Verordnung regelt die Pflichten für KI-Modelle mit allgemeinem Verwendungszweck?
Werfen Sie eine Frage hinein und sehen Sie zu, wie zwei Prüfer unabhängig voneinander suchen — und wie entschieden wird, wenn sie sich widersprechen.
Prüfer A
Sprachmodell 1
- Quellen erscheinen, sobald die Prüfung läuft.
Prüfer B
Sprachmodell 2
- Quellen erscheinen, sobald die Prüfung läuft.
Quotes are verified
A certificate only counts if the statement is actually present at the cited location. A model that fabricates a source loses immediately.
The source decides, not the quantity
The legal act overrides the authority’s interpretation, the interpretation overrides the expert contribution. Repeating it a hundred times changes nothing.
The process is allowed to say “I don’t know”
If both sides rely on equally strong sources, a human decides—and disputed content is marked as disputed in the course.
Why this is documented. The EU AI Act requires that the use of artificial intelligence be traceable and that a human can intervene. Every judgment records which rule applied, which sources supported it, and who confirmed it — accessible to the administration and the instructor.
